Regional Opinions

1. Bmi Regional Opinions

This statistic depicts the result of a survey on Regional Councilors opinion about the inclusion of private hospitals in the framework of the National Healthcare Service. According to survey result, 63 percent of the regional administrators interviewed, declared to be very favorable towards the inclusion of private hospitals in the framework of the NHS, while 34 percent of them stated that pubic resources should be preferably addressed towards public facilities.

Bmi Regional Opinions

Jonathan Cristol writes that reducing security at regional airports make sense since that security is often ineffective at detecting actual threats and there are already strong security measures. More regional stories Over $4.4 million being invested in ice management system in Arnold’s Cove geared at maintaining quality cod Published 20 hours ago. This is important because the insight gained increases understanding of public values, priorities, practices, and opinions, and the information provides decision-makers and regional leaders with important scientific data to make better and more informed regional policy decisions.

Lastly, according to three percent of the respondents, private hospitals should be totally excluded from the NHS. This statistic depicts the result of a survey on Regional Councilors opinion about the inclusion of private hospitals in the framework of the National Healthcare Service.

According to survey result, 63 percent of the regional administrators interviewed, declared to be very favorable towards the inclusion of private hospitals in the framework of the NHS, while 34 percent of them stated that pubic resources should be preferably addressed towards public facilities. Lastly, according to three percent of the respondents, private hospitals should be totally excluded from the NHS.

The most important statistics. Italy: value of public funds allocated for the National Health Service 2001-2018. Italy: percentage change of public funds allocated for the NHS 2002-2018.

Italy: percentage variation of healthcare expenditure 2009-2017, by source. Italy: National Health Fund allocation in 2017, by region. Italy: value of public investments in favor of healthcare bodies 2006-2016. Italy: turnover human health activities 2010-2016.

Italy: turnover of the human health activities 2016, by sector. Italy: public healthcare system revenues 2015-2017. Public expenditure. The most important statistics. Italy: public healthcare expenditure 2012-2016.

Italy: public expenditure on healthcare 2016, by service. Italy: distribution of public expenditure on healthcare 2016, by service. Italy: public healthcare expenditure change 2003-2016. Italy: share of GDP on health expenditure 2006-2017.

Italy: expenditure on healthcare as percentage of GDP 2016, by service. Projected public expenditure on healthcare as a share of GDP in Italy 2013-2060. Italy: public healthcare expenditure 2017, by region. Private expenditure. The most important statistics. Italy: annual private healthcare spending 2012-2017.

Italy: per capita private health expenditure 2009-2018. Italy: household expenditure on health care 2012-2017.

Italy: per capita private healthcare spending 2017, by type and health status. Italy: per capita private healthcare spending 2017, by type and age. Italy: private healthcare spending in 2017, by purpose. Italy: out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure on services 2017, by type. Italy: out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure on goods 2017, by product. Public resources and services.

In the debate currently engulfing Seattle over the proposed head tax for homelessness, important truths are being ignored and pitched rhetoric on both sides has obscured the larger, more important discussion we need to have about how we are going to solve the problem of homelessness in our community. I’m worried that our homeless neighbors’ needs are getting lost in this debate. For the good of the order, I’d like to suggest that we collectively take a few deep breaths, look at the facts and get back to solving this problem together. We owe it to the people experiencing homelessness in our region to set aside our differences and to insist upon solutions guided first and foremost by data and the voices of those with lived experiences. In a nutshell, McKinsey’s analysis shows that the rapidly rising cost of living in King County is pushing thousands of men, women and children into homelessness, and while the region’s response to homelessness has improved markedly, there simply isn’t enough funding or capacity to keep up.

McKinsey’s analysis shows that there is a 96 percent statistical correlation between the dramatic rise in rents in King County in recent years and the growth of the region’s homeless population. For example, the fair market price for a studio apartment has increased by roughly 30 percent since 2014, coinciding with a 42 percent increase in individuals experiencing homelessness in King County. In 2014, there were seven Seattle neighborhoods where the median rent was affordable for a family making between $52,000 and $79,000 a year.

In 2017, there are no neighborhoods where that is true. In fact, since 2011, units that are affordable for families making $48,000 a year or less have decreased by almost 50 percent. Related Opinion stories Editorial: Op-Ed: Op-Ed: Op-Ed: Op-Ed: Editorial: Op-Ed: Brier Dudley: Op-Ed: At the same time that rising costs of living have pushed more and more people into homelessness, King County and state funding for homelessness services have decreased, the McKinsey analysis found. While the number of homeless individuals countywide increased by 42 percent from 2014 to 2017, total funding to address homelessness only increased 7.5 percent.

Critics of increasing spending on homelessness say our local government has mismanaged its funds, but data show the city and county services have become much better at helping people find permanent housing in recent years — our crisis response system moved 35 percent more households into permanent housing in 2017 than 2016. That’s not to say there’s no room for improvement, but increasing efficiency alone is not going to keep up with the dramatic influx of new people falling into homelessness every year. Most Read Opinion Stories. The inconvenient truth is that regardless of whether the city passes the “head tax” and regardless of any continued increases in service efficiencies, we’re going to need to do much more to solve our homelessness crisis. We need to examine our permitting and zoning laws, incentivize construction of affordable housing, and do more to protect people from being evicted and commit to more funding. Most of all, we need to engage those who have experienced homelessness or who are currently homeless to guide our solutions. I moved here in 1981 to work for Microsoft, where I met my wife Tricia, a native of Seattle.

I believe we’re fortunate that companies like Amazon, Starbucks and Microsoft call our region home. These companies and many others have steadily brought an infusion of high-paying jobs to the area and have contributed to a historic economic boom. At the same time, these high-paying jobs have changed the region by driving up rents and the overall cost of living. We must work together to grapple with the unintended consequences of rapid economic growth if we’re all going to be able to call King County home.